Harry How - Getty Images
Timothy Bradley isn't the biggest star out there, but he's no joke of an opponent for Manny Pacquiao on June 9. (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)
With the news coming down that Manny Pacquiao has signed to face Timothy Bradley on June 9 in Las Vegas, many casual boxing fans who care about Manny but only randomly hear about a lot of the other sport's top fighters may be wondering just who in the hell Timothy Bradley is. Allow us to give you a quick primer on Manny's opponent, and why you should care about this fight and take it very seriously.
Timothy Bradley is not Floyd Mayweather Jr, we can grant you that. Mayweather is an otherworldly talent and a superstar, while Bradley has to date simply established himself as the best 140-pound fighter in the world and has never made the crowds "ooh" and "aah" with exhibitions of skill or beautiful boxing.
But the 28-year-old Californian is more than a handful in the ring, and won't be any sort of pushover for Pacquiao.

We'll just focus on the truly relevant portion of Bradley's career, which started in 2008. Bradley, at the time a 24-year-old prospect who hadn't kicked up a lot of dirt while making his climb through the ranks, was scheduled to face former lightweight champ Jose Luis Castillo in a WBC 140-pound eliminator in Mexico. Castillo, as happened too often in his rocky but exciting career, failed to make weight, and the WBC elevated Bradley to the status of mandatory challenger.
To get that chance, Bradley had to go across the entire United States and then the Atlantic Ocean to face long-running titleholder Junior Witter in England. Witter was considered still the No. 2 140-pound fighter in the world, trailing only would've-been rival Ricky Hatton, and was the favorite going into the fight.
Here's what we said after Bradley took the belt on foreign soil, surprising many:
Most of us felt that Witter would dominate the unseasoned Bradley, who had never traveled more than a car ride for any pro fight. But Bradley drilled Witter in the sixth round with a massive overhand right, putting the exclamation point on his momentum grab, and taking full control of the fight.
The first five rounds were quite close, all up-in-the-air scoring affairs, and I gave Bradley three of five. If someone gave Witter the nod in four or even all of them, it's hard to argue. Eventually, it was Witter's total lack of offense that defined the fight, with Bradley pot-shotting his way to what most saw as a pretty definitive victory. A career-starting splash of a win, really.
After that, Bradley easily defeated Edner Cherry in his first title defense on Showtime. Bradley returned to Showtime in April 2009, beating Kendall Holt in a very good fight that saw Bradley climb off the canvas twice but otherwise pretty clearly outbox Holt, one of the sport's most inconsistent good fighters, who did fight quite well that night:
Bradley (24-0, 11 KO) unified his WBC 140-pound title with Holt's WBO strap, and put himself in position for a fight with a bigger star, though that may end up just being Nate Campbell and not the Hatton-Pacquiao winner or anything. For Holt (25-3, 13 KO) this was a heartbreaker, as he lost on scores of 115-111 (twice) and 114-112. Both guys were in good form, the fight was pretty crisp and moved quickly, and Bradley proved for certain he's no one-fight wonder, he's a world class guy at 140 pounds.
We later named Bradley vs Holt one of the 20 Best Fights of 2009 (#14 to be exact).
Nate Campbell was indeed next, and that one got shut down before it could ever really get started, but Bradley was dominating the fight. Bradley originally won the fight on a stoppage when Campbell had an eye injury caused by a headbutt, but that result was later overturned, with the two nearly coming to blows after the CSAC hearing.
Bradley was clearly the better man for the first three rounds and no one will argue that; he dominated Campbell in round three particularly, but Campbell also clearly lost something when he initially complained of a headbutt.
Headbutts are a part of the Bradley arsenal. He's a billygoat fighter and will happily lead with his big, bald dome. This could be a danger to Pacquiao as much as Bradley's talent and ability.
Four months after the Campbell fiasco, Bradley faced Lamont Peterson and dominated a competitive fight, which might sound odd, but that's how it played out. Peterson, who recently defeated Amir Khan as everyone knows and also went to a draw with Victor Ortiz, was in good shape and fought well. It's just that Bradley fought better pretty much every round.
Bradley (25-0, 11 KO) took over and in many rounds, was flat-out dominant. Peterson (27-1, 13 KO) boxed pretty well, but was just a bit outclassed by the stronger Bradley, whose power is better than his KO rate, something it seems we've been noting since the Junior Witter win last year. Bradley used constant motion and a lot of angles to beat a pretty straightforward Peterson, who just couldn't keep up overall.
For Bradley, this could hopefully lead to a big fight. By rights, he should be in the running for a money bout with Ricky Hatton, but he won't be; Hatton wants a bigger name for his opponent, and that's understandable. There are good fights for Bradley, but he may have to seek them out. I don't see anyone banging this guy's door down right now.
As for Peterson, the loss is no shame. Bradley just keeps getting better and better, and losing to a world-class fighter doesn't make you a hype job. Peterson still has a lot of career left, and I'll bet he wins a title or two along the way.
Following the win over Peterson, Bradley and promoter Gary Shaw couldn't find anything acceptable at 140 pounds, as a fight with Devon Alexander (ranked No. 2 in the division at that time behind Bradley) proved too hard to make a reality. Shaw was looking to move the young titleholder over to HBO. He did so in July 2010, matching Bradley at welterweight against Luis Abregu, a strong Argentinean welterweight. This is Bradley's only real fight over 140 pounds.
Bradley was dominant and won easily, but far from spectacular in the victory:
Bradley (26-0, 11 KO) called out Manny Pacquiao after the fight, but also made challenges to 140-pound contenders Devon Alexander, Amir Khan and Marcos Maidana. Bradley would likely be available for a November 13 date with Pacquiao, but as we all know that's not in Top Rank's plans, as they intend to promote either a rematch no one wants to see or a fight against a guy that a major portion of the boxing fanbase has no respect for anymore.
Following that and a debatable win for Alexander over Andriy Kotelnik a few weeks later, HBO put up big-time money to secure a Bradley vs Alexander fight in January 2011. The whole promotion was off from the very beginning, when promoters Shaw and Don King chose to put the fight in the dilapidated Silverdome in Pontiac, Mich., which we said well before the fight happened was a terrible idea. That wasn't hindsight.
But it happened, and it disappointed. Bradley fairly easily won again, beating Alexander by technical decision when the fight was stopped on a headbutt cut (see?) in the 10th round. One of the official scores was close (96-95), but the fight was clearly Bradley's.
The fight to be made then was Bradley vs Amir Khan. It didn't happen, and since it was a year ago and we spent a lot of time talking about it then, I don't want to go into it too much again now, but this is the reality: Amir Khan was not ducked by Timothy Bradley, no matter what anyone says. Bradley wanted out of his deal with Gary Shaw, which was expiring directly after a fight with Khan was to take place. No fighter in the world, looking to get out of an expiring deal, would have fought a fight like that at that point. Not one of them.
Bradley signed with Top Rank, which had been rumored for a while, and fought washed-up Joel Casamayor on the Pacquiao vs Marquez undercard. It wasn't impressive, because it was so one-sided on paper that it couldn't really be impressive, but Bradley marched through Casamayor as expected:
After three knockdowns, a docked point, and zero excitement, WBO junior welterweight titlist Timothy Bradley stopped washed-up Joel Casamayor late in the eighth round to retain his belt in his Top Rank debut.
Bradley (28-0, 12 KO) didn't lose a second of this miserable fight, and Casamayor's trainer ended the fight at 2:59 of the eighth round after another knockdown.
Low blows and headbutts were involved as expected, and Casamayor (38-6-1, 22 KO) just had nothing left. Those who have seen Casamayor in the ring in the last few years knew what to expect and got that much -- or perhaps less.
Bradley, 28, is a possible 2012 opponent for Manny Pacquiao, should Pacquiao prove successful tonight against Juan Manuel Marquez.
Now here we are. Pacquiao did prove successful against Marquez, albeit not without controversy. After the November 12 fights, we took a look at Bradley's chances against the top guys in the sport, one of which was Manny Pacquiao:
Bradley vs Manny Pacquiao
Financial Value: It's a Manny Pacquiao fight, so the money's there. Bradley was put into the Pacquiao co-feature in part to audition as a potential Manny opponent in 2012. I don't think he changed many minds, but he also didn't hurt his stock. And with people who didn't know him already, and didn't know Casamayor was a lousy opponent in 2011 (that's probably a lot of people, by the way), I'm sure he was impressive. He did his job. It's not a huge mega-fight, but Pacquiao has fought Joshua Clottey and a version of Shane Mosley that nobody wanted to see. They sold because of Manny. He can carry Tim Bradley to a profitable event, no doubt.
Fan Value: I get the feeling it's 50-50 here. I have seen a lot of folks who think Tim is a real good style matchup for Manny. I've seen others who believe he lacks the "specialness" to be a serious threat to Pacquiao.
The Fight Itself: Bradley is a very good fighter who isn't afraid to take a shortcut or get rough. Pacquiao doesn't have to deal with that sort of thing often, and I think Bradley might be able to frustrate Manny simply because Bradley doesn't make himself easy to fight. What Tim lacks in physical skills (not a big puncher, not incredibly fast with his hands) he often makes up for in ring IQ and his ability to use his head. With the way Pacquiao often leads with his own head -- Nacho Beristain made an issue of this on "24/7" -- that could result in some ugly clashes. I'd favor Manny, personally, but Bradley is one of those quiet, effective guys who tends to sneak up.
Chances It Happens: I think there are two fights in the way -- Manny vs Floyd, if both sides are serious about making it happen, and then Manny vs Marquez IV. But if Manny-Floyd stays a no-go and Marquez passes on a fourth fight, Bradley is perhaps next in line.
It turned out that after Miguel Cotto beat Antonio Margarito on December 3, Top Rank and Pacquiao wanted a rematch with Cotto. Pacquiao had pretty thoroughly beaten Cotto in 2009, but there was money on the table and the fight was relevant with a large portion of the audience.
But after they couldn't agree on weight, Cotto chose to forget a Pacquiao rematch and fight Floyd Mayweather Jr on May 5. That left Pacquiao and Top Rank with Timothy Bradley. It's a fight that they probably didn't want to make this soon, but it's happening.
[ Related: Pacquiao vs Bradley or Mayweather vs Cotto - Which Is Better? ]
Timothy Bradley has never beaten someone like Manny Pacquiao, but then he'd also never beaten someone like Junior Witter. Floyd Mayweather Jr had never beaten someone like Diego Corrales once upon a time. You never truly know until you know, and Bradley's style figures to pose some problems for Manny Pacquiao.
It's not Pacquiao vs Mayweather, but it's a fight that very much deserves respect and attention. If you still don't really know who Timothy Bradley is, you'll find out on June 9. Bradley can box and he can fight. He's not afraid to make a fight ugly if he has to, and not afraid to use a lot of rough tactics when he has to. He's not going to roll over in this fight, and he's not a slow, plodding guy there to be hit.
Don't expect this to be another easy night for Manny Pacquiao. It's as competitive a fight as can be made for Manny, outside of Floyd Mayweather or maybe another tussle with Juan Manuel Marquez. If you want the best fighting the best, this is a fight you should care about.
0 recs | 27 comments
Great write-up. The best fight of these to get a good idea of Bradley’s skill is against Lamont Peterson, in which Bradley fought Peterson using a number of different styles and adjusted well as the fight progressed.
theninthlayer - February 6, 2012
Bradley has a serious chance at pulling out a win.
Think of this scenario. Mayweather rolls through Cotto (as most seem to think will happen), and Bradley pulls out a win against Pacman (which a minority think is a possibility). How much interest will be left in a Pac/Floyd fight? I personally wouldn’t care much for it anymore.
thetruth - February 6, 2012
Wow, you're really getting ahead of yourself there!
Great summary, Scott. Though a really telling fact is that Bradley had to “climb off the canvas twice” against the immortal Kendall Holt (only 13 KOs in 28 fights). Hmmmm…
Wlksrck - February 6, 2012
Holt is a much bigger puncher than his KO rate leads one to believe. His KO rate is a reflection of his bizarre inconsistency.
Scott Christ - February 7, 2012
Ahead of myself? Keywords: (which a minority think is a possibility)
thetruth - February 6, 2012
I have a feeling this fight will end in a No Contest due to clash of heads
That melon of Tims is no joke. I see a fast paced fight for the first 3 rounds then Bang!!! A skull of made of iron collides with Mannys head and fight over.
PhinsAllDay - February 6, 2012 via mobile
I can see this being similar fight to the Pac vs Cotto but Bradley not being as strong but trying to box a little more. It will be competitive early but after round 4 – 5 Pac takes over. He will drop Bradley at some point and sting him others and will keep on the pressure to walk away with a clear UD.
sigidy - February 6, 2012
What I see is a welterweight battle bbeing fought between one really great 143/45 pounder (Pacquaio) with not much left to prove fighting the best 140 pounder in the world moving up…with his future right in front of him.
In other words, two well matched men in a potentially fresh and exciting fight.
Whatever one says or thinks of Bradley, he beat the best in his division and his record speaks for itself. No other present or former 140 pounder fighting at this moment had and/or has his credentials.
pakinpower - February 6, 2012
He hadn't beaten Khan...
…who was weeks ago has a very good case being on top of the division. but you are right there’s no one better for these guys to share the ring with but each other.
DXB Jerome - February 7, 2012
Pac
Pacquiao will score a late knockout. He will be too quick and will avoid Bradley’s roughhousing. I feel bad for Bradley for having to fight Pac after his poor performance against Marquez. Pac will get back in a big way. Hopefully Mayweather will do what he is supposed to do and maybe just maybe Pac and Mayweather could face off in November or early December.
murrayknowsbest - February 6, 2012
You maybe right...
…but That was also the expectation before Pac-Marquez 3. bottom line is Pac didn’t. One may argue that Marquez has an anti-Pac style but still makes me wonder how he will perform next time.
DXB Jerome - February 7, 2012
I like the fight for competitive purposes
But I hate it for “good fight” purposes. Bradley, at least historically, has been dull to watch against southpaws, which Pacquiao is. And Pacquiao in his last few fights has been more tentative against guys who are willing to compete with him. Both of those together probably means this fight will stink to watch unless you appreciate the “sweet science”. I actually didn’t think Bradley-Alexander was that bad, and I was okay with Pacquiao-Mosley. I’ll probably like this fight, but I suspect that 90% of the casual fans who order it will hate it. And honestly, even if there’s a barnburner on the undercard, most people won’t remember. I know a dozen people who are not boxing fans who ordered Pac-Mosley, and all they remember is the main event, not the awesome Arce-Vazquez fight on the undercard. I wish they would remember it, but they just don’t. It proves that these undercards just don’t matter to most buyers, and I hate that. I wish people would watch the good fights and appreciate them, but they usually don’t.
This will be the same. The main event will probably be a good, competitive boxing match. And all the fans will remember is that it wasn’t action packed. It’s very unfortunate, because this is a pretty good fight. I hope they’re rewarded for making a fight against Bradley rather than making it against someone like Rios (who Pacquaio would lick), but I suspect they won’t.
Brickhaus - February 7, 2012
And for the record
I still have Pacquiao by decision, but this one will also be 116-112 variety.
Pac is as highly rated as he is because of the risks he’s taken and the actual fights he’s fought, not because he’s actually as good as everyone below him. This is another risk and another hard fight, but it’s also one that will serve to show his flaws. It’s the kind of fight Mayweather honestly hasn’t taken since he fought Castillo, but it’s also not enough of a no-brainer to shut up the critics.
But at the end of the day, I really do want to see May-Pac. I don’t think it would be a good fight. Hell, it might kill the sport. But it’s necessary. Oh, and Mayweather wins that one 9 times out of 10.
Brickhaus - February 7, 2012
Really?
It’s sort of hard to fault Floyd for taking Cotto. I’m basically neutral in the Pacquiao-Mayweather wars, but I can see how folks give him a hard time for ducking some big names after he moved up from Lightweight. But can you really give him a hard time about fighting Miguel Cotto?
I think it’s a piece of incredibly clever matchmaking, in the “styles make fights” sense, because I actually don’t think Cotto is the guy who stands the best chance of beating him (Pacquiao aside). I think, weird as it may sound, that someone like Ortiz or Berto stands a better chance because I think the “blueprint” is a guy with enough power to capitalize on a Mosley-like shot to knock him out. Nobody’s going to outpoint him, so the proverbial “puncher’s chance” is where it’s at and Cotto’s not enough of a puncher.
But that said, Miguel Cotto is the third biggest name in boxing, probably. He’s the best non-Pacquiao fighter in Mayweather’s weight range and is a highly-ranked pound-for-pound fighter as well. I can’t clown on Floyd for taking him on, especially since he’s doing it at 154.
AndrewDM - February 7, 2012
There's a reason why Floyd will fight Cotto at 154...
… because he thinks he can win the fight at that weight and because Pac wont do it, but that’s just me.
I just can’t understand why he wouldn’t take the Pacquiao fight.
DXB Jerome - February 7, 2012
Now, I regret posting that last line...
DXB Jerome - February 7, 2012
Risk/Reward
Floyd makes so much fighting, he has grown accutomed to measuring risk before banking his reward. And….he has been richly rewarded while doing so.
pakinpower - February 7, 2012
Brick
I think you ake some good points but I disagree. I think Bradley comes to fight and SSSM did not. JMM came but his sweet science disarmed Pacquaio, who if you watch again you will see ‘brought it’ to the very end. That does not mean he walked into stupid exchanges but it also does not mean that he avoided being offensive.
Marquez and Pacquiao is not a template for Pacquiao vs Anyone else. IMHO.
pakinpower - February 7, 2012
I'm up for it
Not my, or anyone else’s ideal choice for Manny, but I look forward to it. I was disappointed in the way Bradley seemed to scuttle a Khan fight, but aside from that, his career path has been one I respect and root for.
geraldmcgrew - February 7, 2012
Scuttled briefly for greater fame and fortune
pakinpower - February 7, 2012
really?
I don’t see them fighting very soon being on different sides of a promotional cold war, if you can call it cold.
DXB Jerome - February 7, 2012
I meant his career
pakinpower - February 7, 2012
That implies you believe he would have lost to Khan, no?
Otherwise, woudn’t he be making as much or more now?
geraldmcgrew - February 7, 2012
No. It means he wanted a management change
And a shot at exactly what he is getting now. Nothing more complex than that.
Khan Bradley can wait, be made or not. Both fighters had the fights their management arranged. It looks like Bradley not only chose the better path to his ultimate goal (Pacquiao) than Khan who wanted to fight Floyd.
My guess is that in the Khan camp there is a lot of recrimination and second guesssing as to whether fighting Peterson in Washing DC was the right thing to do…all things considered.
Bradley I would wager is over the moon.
One last thing, once the die is cast and fights are set, it is up to the fighter to do his job.Bradley did his in stopping Casamayor in a setup fight. I thought Khan won but he left it too close for comfort in another man’s backyard.
pakinpower - February 7, 2012
If pacfans thought JMM was a cheater...
This fight has ugly written all over it. We all know how nearly all Bradley’s fights are marred by headbutts and cuts. Add in the fact that Pacquiao is a lefty and is occasionally prone to bumping heads as well. And we’ve seen in the past (especially against JMM) how much cuts bother Pacquiao. All of this makes me think we might see a huge upset here – I can imagine Bradley being ahead after 6 or 7 rounds and then an “accidental” butt ending the fight – and is perversely making me look forward to this fight.
ham_napkin - February 7, 2012
Idiots thought JMM was a cheater. Not real fans
pakinpower - February 8, 2012
My thoughts on the Timothy Bradley vs Lamont Peterson fight was “Wow, who is Timothy Bradley?”, then after his last fight vs Casamayor was “why should I care?”. That fight was boring, and he should have got rid of Casamayor early… think Pacman wins by decision
rpm0003 - February 8, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bad Left Hook to post a comment.